Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott Lepsch's avatar

I can’t believe the same people who argued against Kirk Cousins as the answer are now saying we should have kept Sam because he could have been peak Kirk Cousins.

I also feel like we all collectively agreed that if you can’t find an elite QB, you don’t pay them and you try to get a rookie QB. A very good or kinda great QB just hamstrings the organization unless they’re cheap.

Given that frame of mind, it is very easy to see why the Vikings did what they did. The only part of the process I question is how they evaluated McCarthy vs Nix in the draft, and then McCarthy’s readiness to take over this season.

If they knew he wasn’t ready, they should have beaten Indy’s offer for Jones. If they didn’t know he wasn’t ready - yikes.

Robert G's avatar

I'm already so burnt out on the Darnold and the failed plan discussion. I really wanted them to keep Darnold, more than any fan I've seen, but I also understand how it made perfect sense not to. He didn't want to stay long term and tagging him was also kind of treading water. I honestly don't care that it didn't work this season, but I also don't view NFL football through the myopic view of the long suffering Vikings fan. When I think of the current staff, who are overall excellent by comparison to much if the league, I see them as victims of their own success and expectations. Besides the usual setbacks and attrition of an NFL season, they've been able to coast on overall good baseline of football for several seasons. Offensively they have never had to contend with such poor performance outside of expectation. This year has been a great learning experience for everyone involved, players and coaches alike. Many words have been wasted on the current regime's end, but to me this is where it begins. Now that real, sustained adversity has hit, this is where we actually find out who they are.

32 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?