Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wobo Bekwelem's avatar

I wish they could trade down to the end of round 1, get an 2nd or early third and still get three of these four from the top 100 picks - a top end receiver, DT, OL or DB.

Expand full comment
andrew stead's avatar

It's a year or two too soon to use a 1st on a WR. It's critical to get surplus value from players on rookie Ks, but a WR's is severely curtailed when 18, 3 and 87 are all getting significant targets for the next two years. Nailor's production was fine (and consistent with the players cited), plus he's cheap for one more year. Addison is cheap for two more.

Next year (and when ideally the team has 4 picks on days 1/2 of the draft) makes a lot more sense.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts