Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Curt Murphy's avatar

Well... that was anticlimactic. Cousins 5-7 for 23 or 33 yards, both were announced, was terrible. Udoh and O'Neill looked decent but the rest of the line looked less than average. Cousins looked like he was playing scared already. Brown and Mond, though I don't have high expectations, looked terrible. I will say that their supporting cast was equally terrible so it was difficult to lay fault on individuals. I think to achieve "sucked" was the highlight of the Offensive effort this evening. Dropped balls, wrong routes... I knew we were in trouble from the first plays of the game but I didn't expect to see Mond having to help Offensive players line up or get the play right. Considering Brown has had two years with the team makes his performance even less impressive. Looks to me like we have no choice but to enlist the help of a journeyman back up or simply admit we'll lose every game Cousins isn't playing. Watching Cousins caused me to readjust my initial prediction of 10/7 to 8/9. Lets hope Theilen is just "nicked" and that it is not a "tweak"!!

Defense looked decent. Wonnum looked okay. Dye played above average but was not mistake free. Surratt played better than I anticipated. I don't know what to say about Dantzler. He shows both extremes some really good plays some horrible plays. I expected some sacks. I thought Hand had a decent game.

Kick off was a little better with ISM. KJ Osborn missed a wide open lane in the return. I thought Colquitt punted pretty well.

There's so much more that could be stated but I'm exhausted after watching that lol.

Expand full comment
segagenesisgenius's avatar

Hah, man, it is so hard to know what to take from a game in which our top 3 offensive weapons combine for 3 snaps. Matthew points out well how poor the offense performed from top to bottom. It doesn't even matter that Oli Udoh and Ezra Cleveland played extremely well (at least according to The Athletic, personally I don't like to trust my own OL play analysis), Hill looking rough was enough to make the OL an issue/disaster on the day. It is easier to provide help to a tackle than to a guard (just sit a TE next to the OT), but that is still a very big issue. Happily I would rather Hill struggle than Udoh, as I have more trust in Darrisaw eventually being good than I do Davis (such that by the end of the season we are more likely to overcome Hill being bad than Udoh being bad), but frankly in either situation we could be in trouble.

My inclination is to say that it was more important for our defense to play well yesterday than our offense, because an offense with Kirk, JJ, Cook, Thielen, et al. will probably eventually find its footing... that said, it is much worse for our team for our offense to be bad, given how much offense rules the day, such that one van easily argue that it is more troubling for our offense to struggle. Quite a quandry....

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts