Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TwoToedSloth's avatar

One thing that I haven't seen mentioned out there is this. They had a chance to win and they went for it. The line blocked well and they got one of the best FullBacks in the world on a one on one with Seattle's third (fourth?) best linebacker. I believe Ham makes that block 9/10 times. Mattison made the right call by following the lead blocker. If you can backup in hindsight, I'd run the play the same way again, and I bet they get the line to gain.

I think you just have to give props for the run stopping depth linebacker (Ben Gedeon?) making a key play.

Expand full comment
Carter's avatar

Can we build steam on a "Kirk would be smart to take a pay cut" narrative? He performs dramatically better when he has good protection, so why not say "hey Rick, take $5-10M from my base and upgrade our pass blocking?" Then (maybe) this team could make a run in 21/22 as young pieces develop, & he can enjoy some sustained success, stick around for the next 5+ years, or maybe turn strong 21/22 seasons in to a big deal elsewhere.

His alternatives feel like bigger gambles: betting that our OL will play better next year without a big FA addition... that the Vikings will be content with his performance and willing to work around his contract in 22... that he'll be able to find another big deal elsewhere if the Vikings decide it's better to cut bait after 21 and take the cap hit while they re-build (even though the league is moving more and more towards mobile passers)... that if he does sign with another team, they'll be able to provide good enough protection/weapons for that deal to be more than a one-&-done... none of that sounds too appealing, though maybe we'll see a "Jimmy G is out, time for a Kirk & Kyle to re-marry" plot line develop.

Or maybe if we run a few more QB keepers, Kirk will discover that he has Forrest Gump legs!

Anyways, would be cool to see you explore the long term QB options further.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts