Discussion about this post

User's avatar
segagenesisgenius's avatar

This is a good analysis of the weird inflection point that this class is at. So curious how this draft class still has a high chance of being evaluated as terrible (if both Bradbury and Irv Smith take a step back) or average (if both turn into only slightly above players), while also having a maybe 25% chance of turning into a great draft (if both turn into dependable top-ten-ish long-term starters, while simultaneously two or three other players such as Mattison/Cameron Smith/Udoh/Watts/Bisi turn into useful rotational pieces).

If I were to guess I would suggest that it'll turn into an average class (any draft where you get two useful starters and a handful of other interesting guys is not a bad draft), but I wouldn't bet on it.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

My concern here with this class is that the philosophy is playing a significant role in the lack of development. If the Vikings aren’t going to throw the ball why draft Irv Smith? Why draft Mattison if your only going to use him 10 snaps a game. I don’t think they are bad players (except Samia) I think they are not using them correctly but maybe that changes this year who knows.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts