Discussion about this post

User's avatar
segagenesisgenius's avatar

Fun article, and I think that all of the rankings (better/worse/even) are spot on and astute. One interesting wrinkle of the schedule is that the Vikings have some pretty good luck with *when* they face these teams. For example, I like that they are facing Burrow early before he can settle in post-injury and adjust to how teams are facing him differently in year 2, I like that they are facing Big Ben very late in the year (week 14) at which point hopefully the Steelers will be slowing down (similar to how the Steelers started out 11-0 before losing 4 of their last 5 last year), I think it is advantageous to be facing the Rams late where they are more likely to have a few injuries (given how their team is stars and scrubs, even 2 or 3 notable injuries could be massive) such that Stafford might be leaned on similar to how he was in Detroit, and similarly given their injury history it is advantageous to be facing the Niners late in the year when they might not be at peak strength. Conversely, it is bad luck to face the Cardinals so early where Kyler is more likely to be at full health (the difference between how dynamic Kyler was pre- and post-shoulder injury is dramatic - he went from at least 10 rushes for at least 60 yards before the injury to no more than 5 rushes for no more than 30 yards afterwards), we are facing the Chargers late enough that feasibly Herbert might have adjusted to his new OC and also to any adjustments that his opponents are collectively making against him in year 2, we are facing the Ravens right after their bye week so we should be facing a fresh Lamar (a terrifying thought) and a team that will have time to prepare for us (same with the Cowboys, but at least the playing field is level there with both teams coming off byes), and potentially Fields might have enough playing time to have some familiarity with the Bears offense by the time we face them (I am on the record as not being high on Fields, but I would still prefer to face him early). On par I think the Vikings are on the positive side of that ledger and am pleased that the schedule doesn't seem to give the Vikings any massive disadvantages (they are also at home for their Thursday game for only the 2nd time of the Zimmer era).

Also, I was amused by how Purple Insider just can't help itself from using hyperbole in describing Sam Darnold. As I said above, I agree that Cousins has a clear edge in this matchup, and any analytical analysis of Darnold should end up with a strongly pessimistic viewpoint of him, but it feels like a stubbornly anti-factual position to state that there is literally "no evidence" that Sam Darnold is good. I mean, here are some quick facts - he was dealing with mono in 2019 and when he came back healthy the team ended the year going 6-2 even though Darnold had a partially torn ligament in his thumb (and in that stretch had virtually identical Y/A and AY/A as Herbert had last year), in 2020 he had a substantial shoulder injury but still had the 6th highest completion percentage in the NFL in a clean pocket (but this was extremely rare because the Jets OL allowed pressure within 2.5 seconds at the highest rate in the NFL), he has played every snap under Gase who has repeatedly shown a super-human ability to suppress the performance/ability/stats of his players, the Jets team was fantastically terrible around him and went 0-9 in games that Darnold missed (for comparison's sake Tannehill's teams were 10-15 without him, so Tannehill was on FAR better teams than Darnold ever was), and also he is younger than Joe Burrow and less than a year older than Herbert.

Now, does any/all of that mean that Darnold will be good, or even has a good chance to be good? Nope, sure doesn't! It also is easily outweighed by the many stats that detail strongly how Darnold has struggled. But those facts that I provided are certainly more than "no evidence." Personally I would categorize it as "uninspiring evidence." They are real facts that support the idea that Darnold might not be washed up at the ripe old age of 23. I won't bet on it, and in fact would actively bet against it, but I also find it amusing to argue against it with such intense vigor. But then what is sports without having your HAWT TAEK that you believe and will argue with unjustified fervor? I for one support this boldly planted and vehemently defended flag that Purple Insider is standing besides. Down with Darnold!

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

The Cardinals and Cowboys games will be very interesting. Murray and Prescott are better QBs than Cousins but Zimmer is a Superior coach to Kingsbury and McCarthy. And if you don’t think coaches matter watch Carolina and Sanfran last year

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts