Discussion about this post

User's avatar
andrew stead's avatar

There are a lot of lazy takes. But, calling the Jackson-isn't-a-qb takes "lazy" is unkind to lazy and undeservedly generous to Polian et al.

The thing with Murray:

1. There have been a lot of QB contracts. There is no precedent before/since for one requiring prescribed amounts of film study.

2. Would anyone hire an accountant feeling the need to include provisions that they "wouldn't steal" and "personal tax returns will be filed by April 15, not in July?" Would anyone go to a dentist where the waiver includes a positive obligation to wear glasses and be sober before picking up the drill?

3. That provision in the Murray contract is a real thing that happened, and was/remains a serious red flag.

4. None of that means Murray will or won't shine this year, and it's impossible to a have a bad one year, minimum salary contract.

No posts

Ready for more?